If you’re looking for the Anjouan gaming license official site, here’s what the official websites say and how to verify them. They cite regulation under the Betting and Gaming Act 2005, name the Gaming Board/AOFA as authorities, and promote 1–3 month processing. Published costs commonly include a €1,700 state application fee, €250,000 share capital, and a €13,300 annual supervision fee, with one license marketed to cover both B2C and B2B activities across casino, betting, poker, bingo, eSports, lotteries, and software providers. Because multiple sites claim to be the exclusive authority or agent, always confirm a license in the public register by name or number, and check status, authorized activities, and approved URLs on the website. Review the KYC/AML checklist, restricted jurisdictions (including the USA, UK, France, Germany, and FATF‑blacklisted countries), and the stated dispute process before you apply. Note that third‑party reports flag contradictions around what is “official” in Anjouan, so treat each site’s claims with care and rely on verifiable records.
What counts as the official site for the Anjouan gaming license?
When founders message me “What is the official site for the Anjouan gaming license?” I usually answer with a question: official according to whom? In this niche, multiple websites present themselves as the official gateway, authority, or sole agent. That makes the first legal task not the application, but verifying the authority behind the application.
A genuinely official site should tie back to a legal mandate. In practice, that means you should be able to connect the website’s claims to an enacted law, a named regulator created by that law, and government-controlled records or gazettes that confirm appointments, delegations, or exclusive agency. If you can’t trace that chain, treat the site as a commercial service provider—even if it looks and sounds “official.”
The moving pieces behind “official”
You’ll see recurring names on different websites: the Anjouan Offshore Financial Authority (AOFA), the Gaming Board of Anjouan/Anjouan Gaming Board, “Gaming Control Anjouan,” and private companies positioning as the sole authorized agent (for example, Anjouan Corporate Services) or as the exclusive and official authority (for example, Anjouan Licensing Services Inc.). These entities appear across marketing pages, “license registers,” and application portals.
The problem is that these claims do not always align with public, government-run records. Multiple websites assert exclusivity or official status, but do not link back to verifiable government sources. As a corporate lawyer, I treat all such claims as unverified unless supported by the statute, gazette notices, or a government website under state control.
Statutory anchor and public records
Most sites reference a Betting and Gaming Act 2005 and a regulator called the Gaming Board of Anjouan. You should insist on primary sources: the text of the Act as passed and any amendments; official appointments; and a public licensing framework published by the competent government. If a site cannot provide that, your risk escalates.
There is also a broader constitutional overlay. According to commentary citing a 2024 FATF/GAFI Mutual Evaluation for the Union of the Comoros, gambling is prohibited under the Comorian Penal Code. If accurate, that creates tension between national law and any island-level licensing claims. I recommend you treat this as a legal red flag and obtain a written legal opinion from counsel with Union-level and Anjouan-specific expertise before you rely on any “official” website.
How to verify the real website before you apply
Start with provenance, not design. Ask the site to provide the legal basis for its mandate. You’re looking for statute titles, dates, and links to primary government sources. Marketing pages, PDFs hosted on the same site, and unreferenced “guidelines” are not enough. If the website claims to be the official authority or sole agent, request the gazetted appointment or an official delegation instrument.
Map the domain to an institution. Government-controlled domains, national gazettes, or ministry portals carry far more weight than commercial .coms. If the website claims to represent AOFA or the Gaming Board, look for independent confirmation on a government domain, and ensure the names, addresses, and officers match across sources.
Perform technical and corporate checks. Run a WHOIS to see who owns the domain and when it was registered. Check the company behind the website in corporate registries. Verify that the postal address exists and that the telephone numbers connect to a real office. Ask for a compliance contact and speak to them. Real regulators respond; lead-gen sites often don’t.
A compact verification checklist
- Statutory proof: link to primary law and gazette notices.
- Government cross-reference: confirmation on a government-controlled website.
- Domain provenance: government domain vs. private .com; WHOIS consistency.
- Named officials: titles and names that appear in independent government sources.
- License register integrity: live search of licensees with verifiable URLs.
- Complaint process: response time, procedures, outcome transparency.
- Banking and AML: clear policies consistent with international standards.
Reading the “official” license register like a pro
Many sites present a “License Register.” That can be helpful, but only if the register is traceable to the regulator’s mandate and maintained by the competent authority. A credible register should list, at minimum: licensee name, license number, authorization scope, authorized URLs, status (active/suspended/revoked), and the issue/expiry dates. It should also state its update cadence and the legal effect of a listing.
Cross-verify any casino or sportsbook that claims to be licensed. The authorized URLs in the register must match the brand’s live domains and mirror what appears in the brand’s footer. If the register does not list a site, treat the license claim as suspect. If the register lists a site but the operator’s footer references a different regulator or number, ask the “official” site to explain the mismatch in writing.
Red flags in a public register
If you notice typos in licensee names, impossible dates, broken search, or no record of suspensions, be cautious. A register with only “active” entries is marketing, not regulation. If there’s no published complaints log, no dispute resolution steps, or no data on responsible gaming, that also undermines credibility.
What providers are currently claiming “official” status
Several websites and companies present themselves as the official authority, the exclusive representative of AOFA and the Anjouan Gaming Board, or the only authorized agent for applications. Some also publish their own “official” license registers and compliance statements. Treat each of these as an advertised claim, not a fact, until you can tie the site to government sources.
A quick way to triage these claims is to ask for three things: the gazetted instrument appointing the body; a government landing page that names and links to the body; and a current organizational chart with named officials. Genuine authorities can provide all three or will point you to where they are published.
| Advertised authority (as seen on websites) | What they claim to be |
|---|---|
| AOFA / Anjouan Offshore Financial Authority | Umbrella authority for offshore finance and gaming |
| Gaming Board of Anjouan / Gaming Control Anjouan | The regulator for online gaming |
| Anjouan Corporate Services / similar agents | Only authorized agent for license applications |
| Anjouan Licensing Services Inc. / similar portals | Exclusive and official licensing authority |
Do not treat the table as an endorsement. Use it to structure your due diligence questions and demand primary proof.
Reported terms, costs, and timelines on the websites
Application pages commonly advertise a streamlined process with fast decisions. Timeframes of one to three months are widely quoted. Some sites publish fixed application fees (for example, around €1,700), annual supervision fees (for example, around €13,300), and minimum share capital (for example, around €250,000). Others emphasize that any company from “almost any country” can apply and that servers can be hosted globally.
You’ll also see several commercial advantages repeated: a single license covering most iGaming verticals (casino, betting, bingo, poker, eSports, live games, scratch cards), “no taxes” on gross gaming revenue, and the ability to operate under multiple brands and domains. Treat these as marketing positions until they are confirmed in your license conditions and the governing law. If “no gaming taxes” is advertised, clarify whether corporate income tax, VAT, or withholding tax obligations still apply anywhere in your structure.
The B2C vs B2B split
Most sites separate B2C (operators offering games to players) and B2B (suppliers providing platforms, content, or payments to licensed operators). For B2C, expect a higher burden on player protection, AML/KYC, and fair-play controls. For B2B, expect technical testing, secure development practices, and documented change control. Get the exact scope in writing because “one license covers all” can still require annexes listing authorized activities.
Compliance realities after you get a license
Even if you accept the authority of an anjouan website and receive a license, you still need to operate within international norms. Payment processors, banks, and suppliers will ask who your regulator is and whether your license is recognized. They will also screen your geography. Many sites list restricted countries including the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, the Netherlands, Curaçao, Australia, and all FATF‑blacklisted jurisdictions. If your brand accepts deposits from any restricted country and later voids winnings, expect disputes and processor scrutiny.
You may also encounter staffing and substance expectations. Some application pages mention a local staff requirement and on-going oversight. If that appears in your license conditions, plan for it. Likewise, your AML framework must stand up to third‑party audits. Have documented PEP/sanctions screening, source‑of‑funds escalation, and transaction monitoring playbooks ready from day one.
Player protection and complaints
There is public criticism of anjouan-licensed sites in user forums and review platforms. Some players report slow or absent responses from “official” complaint channels and allege weak enforcement around confiscations after deposits from restricted countries. These are allegations, not adjudicated findings, but they elevate reputational risk. If you license under this regime, counterbalance with robust internal complaint handling, independent ADR arrangements, and clear, fair T&Cs.
Practical due diligence playbook I use for clients
I approach any “official site” with the same seven steps. First, collect the statute, gazette notices, and any delegation instruments. Without these, pause. Second, find the regulator on a government-controlled website and confirm the same names and addresses. Third, check whether the national legal framework (Union of the Comoros) allows the activity at all and how island autonomy works in practice.
Fourth, interrogate the license register. Pick three random licensees and verify their URLs, corporate entities, and contact data. Fifth, send a complaint scenario to test the response time and process. Sixth, speak to two independent banks or payment providers about whether they accept this license for onboarding. Seventh, commission a short legal memo from local counsel covering legality, enforcement, and practical recognition of the license abroad.
If any of these steps fails, treat the “official” site as a private intermediary. You might still proceed—but with eyes open, risk-priced contracts, and contingency plans for processor migration.
FAQs I get about the Anjouan gaming license website
How do I know a site is truly official? You don’t, until you tie it to the law, to a regulator created by that law, and to government-controlled publications confirming the appointment. Screenshots and badges are not proof. Ask for primary sources.
Does “no taxes” mean zero taxes? Usually it refers to no local gaming GGR tax. It does not guarantee zero corporate tax, VAT, payroll tax, or withholding obligations across your group. Your tax profile depends on your full structure and where value is created.
Can I apply using a non‑Anjouan company? Some websites say yes; others say companies must be incorporated in Anjouan. Rely on what is written in your license conditions and the statute, not on marketing pages. If the official site says “any company,” ask for the legal basis.
Will processors accept this license? Mixed results. Many PSPs and banks evaluate the regulator’s independence, the quality of enforcement, and the consistency with international AML/CFT norms. You should pre-negotiate with processors before you commit to this route.
What about renewals and rejections? Renewal terms, audits, and potential rejections should be spelled out in your license conditions. Common reasons cited on websites include non-compliance, incomplete documentation, and financial instability. Build a compliance calendar and keep your KYC, policies, and financials current.
Bottom line for founders hunting the official site
Treat every anjouan gaming license website as a claim that needs verification. Demand the statute. Demand the gazette. Demand the government cross-link. Confirm the register and test the complaints process. Then overlay your own commercial reality: payment rails, bank appetite, and market access. If the “official” foundation is solid and your go-to-market is clean, proceed. If it’s opaque, price the risk—or walk.
| Topic | Key facts | Claimed official bodies and sites | Conflicts and risks to know | What to check on the official website | Typical figures and requirements |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Who issues the Anjouan gaming license | The license is presented as an internet gaming authorization from the autonomous island of Anjouan (Union of the Comoros). Some sites call it an “Anjouan Internet Gaming License.” | Names that appear online: Anjouan Offshore Financial Authority (AOFA), Anjouan Gaming Board/Gaming Control Anjouan, Anjouan Licensing Services Inc., and Anjouan Corporate Services (described as an “only authorized agent”). | Multiple entities claim to be “exclusive,” “sole,” or “official.” The Central Bank of the Comoros has issued warnings in the past about offshore licensing claims tied to AOFA (in finance). The 2024 FATF report notes gambling is prohibited under the Comorian Penal Code, creating legal inconsistency with marketing around the Anjouan gaming license. | An “official” site should state the enabling law, name the regulator, show contact details tied to a public authority, and link to an up-to-date license register. Look for clear statutory citations and verifiable government references. | Legal base often cited: Betting and Gaming Act 2005 (Anjouan). Regulator names vary by site. Treat “exclusive” or “sole administrator” claims as marketing until verified. |
| Official license register | Registers list licensee name, license number, issue/expiry date, status, authorized activities, and authorized URLs. | Some sites present a “License Register” or “Register of License Holders in Good Standing.” | More than one website hosts a register. Not all lists may be authoritative or current. | Use the register to match an operator’s exact legal name, license number, and the domain you are visiting (authorized URLs). Check update date; one register claims updates as of 15 November 2025. | If a casino’s footer license does not appear on the register, or its domain is missing from authorized URLs, treat it as not in good standing. |
| License scope (B2C) | B2C license lets operators offer games to players in permitted markets under fair play and compliance standards. | Marketed as global reach and strategic credibility. | Acceptance varies by payment processors, banks, and partners. Some markets and suppliers may not accept the license. | Site should list permitted activities and show responsible gaming, AML, and dispute policies. | One “universal” online license is often advertised to cover casino, betting, poker, bingo, live games, eSports, scratch cards, and more. |
| License scope (B2B) | B2B license covers suppliers of software, platforms, and gaming services to licensed operators. | Presented as meeting testing and compliance requirements for fair play. | Downstream acceptance depends on counterparties and target markets; some will ask for stricter or local approvals. | Look for supplier approval criteria, testing standards, and a public list of certified suppliers if available. | Typical inclusions: platform providers, game studios, payment tech, white-label solutions, and integrations. |
| Eligibility and incorporation | Some pages say licenses are issued only to Anjouan-incorporated companies; nominee directors may be allowed; servers may be hosted anywhere; profits may be banked globally. | Other pages say you can apply using “almost any company from anywhere in the world.” | These statements conflict. Expect a regulator to require a local entity and accountable management. | Website should clearly state if local incorporation is mandatory and whether local staff are required. | Published items vary: local staff required (yes, per some), minimum share capital €250,000 (per some). Verify before committing. |
| Application process | Marketed as streamlined and “state-of-the-art,” with fast onboarding. | Some claim the most modern process among internet gaming licensors. | Speed depends on complete documents and regulator review; “fast” is not guaranteed. | Site should show a step-by-step guide, forms, timelines, and a direct contact channel. | Typical steps: eligibility check, company setup, KYC/AML, business plan, policy drafting (AML, RG, privacy), technical review, submission, correspondence, decision. |
| Timeframes | Suggested processing window is short. | 1–3 months is commonly quoted. | Timelines can slip due to due diligence, clarifications, or policy gaps. | Look for service level expectations and average processing statistics. | Plan buffer time for follow-up questions and system tests. |
| Fees and taxes | Fixed annual license fee model is common. | “Accessible” fees and “no gaming taxes on GGR” are frequently promoted. | Low fees and zero GGR tax can attract scrutiny from banks and partners. | Site should list government fees vs. service fees and renewal costs. | Examples seen online: application fee ~€1,700; annual supervision ~€13,300. Confirm in writing; figures vary by provider and package. |
| KYC and due diligence | Individuals: certified ID, proof of address, bank reference, certificate of good conduct (no criminal record). Corporates: certified constitutional documents and bank reference. | Documents must be certified by recognized professionals (lawyer, banker, notary, accountant, actuary). | Missing or outdated documents delay or sink applications. | Website should provide a precise document checklist and certification rules. | Ensure notarization, apostille, or legalization if required. |
| Restricted countries | Operators must block certain jurisdictions. | Commonly listed: the United States, the United Kingdom, France, the Netherlands, Curaçao, Australia, Germany, and FATF‑blacklisted countries. | Lists change; offering games in a banned country risks suspension or revocation. | Site should publish a current restricted-country list and geo‑blocking guidance. | Verify your geo‑IP filters, KYC rules, and payment screening against the list. |
| Renewal and rejection | Renewals require ongoing compliance and financial stability. | Frequent rejection causes: non‑compliance, incomplete documentation, weak finances. | Poor record‑keeping or unresolved complaints can derail renewal. | Site should explain renewal timelines, fees, and audit expectations. | Maintain updated policies, testing reports, and responsible gaming metrics. |
| Compliance obligations | AML/CFT, responsible gaming, player verification, fair play, and clear T&Cs. | Some sites stress alignment with “international best practices.” | Enforcement standards are debated by players and reviewers. | Website should show policies, complaint channels, and dispute resolution steps. | Keep evidence of age checks, affordability checks, and game RTP audits. |
| Technical and hosting | Hosting location is flexible; multiple brands and domains may be allowed under one license. | Authorized URLs are listed on the license/register. | Domains outside the authorized list can be flagged as unlicensed. | Register page should display authorized URLs per licensee. | Keep change logs when adding or removing domains; seek prior approval if required. |
| Player protection and reputation | Some marketing highlights global trust and transparency. | Consumer reviews report mixed experiences. One thread mentions a low Trustpilot score (e.g., 2.1/5) for anjouangaming.com and slow complaint handling. | Perception issues may affect conversion, payment approval, and affiliate relationships. | Site should publish SLAs for complaints, ADR/ODR routes, and regulator contacts. | Track complaint resolution times and publish clear withdrawal rules. |
| Legal framework | Sites cite the Anjouan Betting and Gaming Act 2005 and a local gaming board. | The FATF 2024 report states gambling is prohibited by the Comorian Penal Code, signaling a legal conflict with promotional claims. | Legal uncertainty can affect enforcement, banking, and partner onboarding. | Website should link to the enabling law and official gazette or government notices. | Obtain written legal opinions if you plan to rely on the license for banking or B2B contracts. |
| Pros often advertised | Fast setup, broad coverage under one license, accessible pricing, no GGR tax, startup‑friendly. | “World‑class gateway,” “modern platform,” “global credibility.” | Marketing language may overstate recognition in stricter markets. | Look for concrete evidence: approved operators, audits, and published enforcement actions. | Validate acceptance with PSPs, banks, game suppliers, and affiliates before launch. |
| Cons to consider | Varying market acceptance, regulatory contestation, potential banking friction, and country blocks. | Some sites accuse the regime of light oversight. | Risk of reputational drag and partner hesitancy. | Official site should show enforcement history and public sanctions to evidence oversight. | Have a plan to upgrade to local or tier‑1 licenses for target markets. |
| How to verify an operator’s license | Match the casino’s license number and legal name with the register. Confirm the exact website domain appears under “authorized URLs.” | If a casino uses an Anjouan license claim, it should be visible on the register. | If the domain or company is missing, treat the claim as unverified. | Use the register search, check the update date, and cross‑check TLS certificate and WHOIS data. | Ask the operator for a copy of the license letter, issue date, and regulator contact for confirmation. |
| How to vet the official site | Confirm the regulator’s full legal name, address, and statutory citations. Check that the “official” site hosts the register and publishes policies, fees, and procedures. | Be wary of multiple sites claiming “exclusive” or “only authorized agent” status. | Duplicated branding and overlapping claims are red flags. | Look for consistent identity across the site, register, and contact email domain. | Prefer sites that publish audit criteria, restricted lists, and enforcement records. |
| Practical next steps for operators | Map target markets, confirm country blocks, align AML/RG policies, and lock down payment routes that accept Anjouan coverage. | Many providers offer “end‑to‑end” packages. | Package promises can hide extra costs or weak compliance. | Request a written scope, timelines, and government fee breakdown on the website. | Keep all approvals and correspondence for bank onboarding and renewals. |
| Keywords to find the right page | Use: “anjouan gaming license official site,” “anjouan license register,” “anjouan gaming authority website,” “anjouan b2c b2b license,” “authorized urls anjouan.” | Add the operator’s brand name when verifying claims. | Avoid ads that mimic regulator pages. | Prefer organic results and direct links from the register. | Bookmark the verified register and guidance pages once found. |